Stylized least-cost analysis of flexible nuclear power in deeply decarbonized electricity systems considering wind and solar resources worldwide

  • Kriegler, E. et al. The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: an overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Climatic Change 123353–367 (2014).

    Google Scholar

  • Steinberg, D. et al. Electrification and Decarbonization: Exploring US Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Scenarios with Widespread Electrification and Power Sector Decarbonization https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1372620 (2017).

  • Leibowicz, BD et al. Optimal decarbonization pathways for urban residential building energy services. Apple. Energy 2301311–1325 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • Luderer, G. et al. Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways. Nat. Clim. Change 8626–633 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • Jenkins, JD, Luke, M. & Thernstrom, S. Getting to zero carbon emissions in the electric power sector. Joule 22498–2510 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2019 (International Renewable Energy Agency, 2020).

  • Gielen, D. et al. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Rev. 2438–50 (2019).

    Google Scholar

  • Williams, JH et al. Carbon‐neutral pathways for the United States. AGU Adv. 2e2020AV000284 (2021).

    Google Scholar

  • Shaner, MR, Davis, SJ, Lewis, NS & Caldeira, K. Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power in the United States. Energy Environ. Sci. 11914–925 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • Sepulveda, NA, Jenkins, JD, de Sisternes, FJ & Lester, RK The role of firm low-carbon electricity resources in deep decarbonization of power generation. Joule 22403–2420 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • Becker, S., Rodriguez, RA, Andresen, GB, Schramm, S. & Greiner, M. Transmission grid extensions during the build-up of a fully renewable pan-European electricity supply. Energy 64404–418 (2014).

    Google Scholar

  • Dowling, JA et al. Role of long-duration energy storage in variable renewable electricity systems. Joule 41907–1928 (2020).

    Google Scholar

  • Tong, F., Yuan, M., Lewis, NS, Davis, SJ & Caldeira, K. Effects of deep reductions in energy storage costs on highly reliable wind and solar electricity systems. iScience 23101484 (2020).

    Google Scholar

  • Bird, L. et al. Wind and solar energy curtailment: a review of international experience. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 65577–586 (2016).

    Google Scholar

  • Khttab, K. Nuclear power reactors in the world. Atom Dev. 3343–55 (2021).

    Google Scholar

  • Assumptions to Annual Energy Outlook 2021 (US Energy Information Administration, 2021); https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/assumptions/

  • Wiliarty, SE Nuclear power in Germany and France. Polity 45281–296 (2013).

    Google Scholar

  • Morgan, MG, Abdulla, A., Ford, MJ & Rath, M. US nuclear power: the vanishing low-carbon wedge. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1157184–7189 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program (US Department of Energy, 2020); https://www.energy.gov/ne/nuclear-reactor-technologies/advanced-reactor-demonstration-program

  • Exploring the Role of Advanced Nuclear in Future Energy Markets: Economic Drivers, Barriers, and Impacts in the United States (Electric Power Research Institute, 2018).

  • Lovering, JR, Yip, A. & Nordhaus, T. Historical construction costs of global nuclear power reactors. Energy Policy 91371–382 (2016).

    Google Scholar

  • Li, Y. et al. Load shifting of nuclear power plants using cryogenic energy storage technology. Apple. Energy 1131710–1716 (2014).

    Google Scholar

  • Alva, G., Lin, Y. & Fang, G. An overview of thermal energy storage systems. Energy 144341–378 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • Yuan, M. et al. Would firm generators facilitate or deter variable renewable energy in a carbon-free electricity system? Apple. Energy 279115,789 (2020).

    Google Scholar

  • Nicolosi, M., Mills, AD & Wiser, RH The Importance of High Temporal Resolution in Modeling Renewable Energy Penetration Scenarios (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2010).

  • Planning Resource Adequacy Analysis, Assessment and Documentation. Standard BAL-502-RF-03 (North American Electric Reliability Corporation, 2017); https://www.nerc.com/pa/Stand/Reliability%20Standards/BAL-502-RF-03.pdf

  • Tapia-Ahumada, KD, Reilly, J., Yuan, M. & Strzepek, K. Deep Decarbonization of the US Electricity Sector: Is There a Role for Nuclear Power? (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, 2019).

  • Schlömer, S. et al. Annex III: Technology-specific cost and performance parameters in IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  • Cany, C., Mansilla, C., Mathonnière, G. & da Costa, P. Nuclear power supply: going against the misconceptions. Evidence of nuclear flexibility from the French experience. Energy 151289–296 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • Jenkins, JD et al. The benefits of nuclear flexibility in power system operations with renewable energy. Apple. Energy 222872–884 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • Future of solar photovoltaic. (International Renewable Energy Agency, 2019).

  • Future of wind. (International Renewable Energy Agency, 2019).

  • Schmidt, O., Melchior, S., Hawkes, A. & Staffell, I. Projecting the future levelized cost of electricity storage technologies. Joule 381–100 (2019).

    Google Scholar

  • Steffen, B. Estimating the cost of capital for renewable energy projects. Energy Icon. 88104783 (2020).

    Google Scholar

  • Tollefson, J. Can the world kick its fossil-fuel addiction fast enough? Nature 556422–425 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • Bilgili, F., Koçak, E., Bulut, Ü. & Kuşkaya, S. Can biomass energy be an efficient policy tool for sustainable development? Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 71830–845 (2017).

    Google Scholar

  • Moran, EF, Lopez, MC, Moore, N., Müller, N. & Hyndman, DW Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 11511891–11898 (2018).

    Google Scholar

  • Albertus, P., Manser, JS & Litzelman, S. Long-duration electricity storage applications, economics, and technologies. Joule 421–32 (2020).

    Google Scholar

  • Bistline, JET & Blanford, GJ Impact of carbon dioxide removal technologies on deep decarbonization of the electric power sector. Nat. Commun. 123732 (2021).

    Google Scholar

  • Lund, JW & Toth, AN Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2020 worldwide review. Geothermics 90101915 (2021).

    Google Scholar

  • Sepulveda, NA, Jenkins, JD, Edington, A., Mallapragada, DS & Lester, RK The design of space for long-duration energy storage in decarbonized power systems. Nat. Energy 6506–516 (2021).

    Google Scholar

  • Song, X. et al. Review on thermophysical properties and corrosion performance of molten salt in high temperature thermal energy storage. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 474052071 (2020).

    Google Scholar

  • Seetharaman, M., Patwa, K., Saravanan, N. & Gupta, Y. Breaking barriers in deployment of renewable energy. Heliyon 5e01166 (2019).

    Google Scholar

  • What Will Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Cost? (Energy Innovation Reform Project, 2017); https://www.innovationreform.org/2017/07/01/will-advanced-nuclear-power-plants-cost/

  • Levelized Cost of Energy and Levelized Cost of Storage 2019 (Lazard, 2019); https://www.lazard.com/perspective/lcoe2019

  • System Advisor Model (SAM) version 2018.11.11 https://sam.nrel.gov/download/version-2020-2-29.html (2018).

  • Tong, D. et al. Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power worldwide. Nat. Commun. 126146 (2021).

    Google Scholar

  • Toktarova, A., Gruber, L., Hlusiak, M., Bogdanov, D. & Breyer, C. Long term load projection in high resolution for all countries globally. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 111160–181 (2019).

    Google Scholar

  • Gelaro, R. et al. The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Clim. 305419–5454 (2017).

    Google Scholar

  • Bett, PE & Thornton, HE The climatological relationships between wind and solar energy supply in Britain. Renew. Energy 8796–110 (2016).

    Google Scholar

  • Clack, CTM, Alexander, A., Choukulkar, A. & MacDonald, AE Demonstrating the effect of vertical and directional shear for resource mapping of wind power: demonstrating the effect of vertical and directional shear for resource mapping of wind power. Wind Energy 191687–1697 (2016).

    Google Scholar

  • Sedaghat, A., Hassanzadeh, A., Jamali, J., Mostafaeipour, A. & Chen, W.-H. Determination of rated wind speed for maximum annual energy production of variable speed wind turbines. Apple. Energy 205781–789 (2017).

    Google Scholar

  • Braun, JE & Mitchell, JC Solar geometry for fixed and tracking surfaces. Solar Energy 31439–444 (1983).

    Google Scholar

  • Meeus, JH Astronomical Algorithms (Willmann-Bell, 1991).

  • Reindl, DT, Beckman, WA & Duffie, JA Diffuse fraction correlations. Solar Energy 451–7 (1990).

    Google Scholar

  • Huld, T., Gottschalg, R., Beyer, HG & Topič, M. Mapping the performance of PV modules, effects of module type and data averaging. Solar Energy 84324–338 (2010).

    Google Scholar

  • Pfenninger, S. & Staffell, I. Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data. Energy 1141251–1265 (2016).

    Google Scholar

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Back to top button
    THE-NEWS-PAGE